Re: Debian for kids

To: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debian for kids
From: John Lapeyre <lapeyre@physics.arizona.edu>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 11:53:41 -0700
Message-id: <20000211115341.A4500@physics.arizona.edu>
In-reply-to: <20000211165555.19F571B9D6@chunks.gag.com>; from bdale@gag.com on Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 09:55:55AM -0700
References: <38A43352.9DAC438B@mindspring.com> <20000211165555.19F571B9D6@chunks.gag.com>

    !!??? What a lot of extraneous verbaciousness.  Bdale and company  want to 
customize debian for kids and they want to call it 
"Debian for Kids".  Why is this so difficult to understand?
 This thread looks like slashdot.


-- 
John Lapeyre <lapeyre@physics.arizona.edu>,  lapeyre@debian.org
Tucson,AZ     http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Debian for kids
  - From: "Keith G. Murphy" <keithmur@mindspring.com>
- Re: Debian for kids
  - From: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>

Prev by Date: Re: problem with update-inetd!
Next by Date: Re: Bug#57740: Security: Many files are kept a+w
Previous by thread: Re: Debian for kids
Next by thread: Re: Debian for kids
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread