Re: TeTeX bugs

To: Dylan Paul Thurston <dpt@math.berkeley.edu>
Cc: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@pasteur.fr>, Paul Seelig <pseelig@mail.uni-mainz.de>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: TeTeX bugs
From: Denis Barbier <barbier@imacs.polytechnique.fr>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 23:35:54 +0100 (CET)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1000314231826.911B-100000@localhost>
Reply-to: Denis Barbier <barbier@imacs.polytechnique.fr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000314125347.A2845@math.berkeley.edu>

On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Dylan Paul Thurston wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 01:11:03PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > Since the teTeX in slink works fine and the one is potato is broken
> > (a bug in babel which prevents compilation of *every* document in
> > French), I prefer the old stuff.
> 
> Surely that should be an important bug (#42698)?  In fact, browsing
> the bugs against tetex-base, several of them seem important, including
> at least one security bug (#57746, same as #32652).  Should I upgrade
> them?  Unfortunately, the security bug seems non-trivial to fix.

Where is this security flaw?
There has been no response to the question asked by Christoph Martin on
1 Feb 1999
<URL:http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=32652>

Denis

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: TeTeX bugs
  - From: Denis Barbier <barbier@imacs.polytechnique.fr>
- Re: TeTeX bugs
  - From: Christoph Martin <martin@uni-mainz.de>

References:
- TeTeX bugs
  - From: Dylan Paul Thurston <dpt@math.berkeley.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)
Next by Date: Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)
Previous by thread: TeTeX bugs
Next by thread: Re: TeTeX bugs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread