Re: how about a real unstable?

To: John Haggerty <haggerjo@localhost.localdomain>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: how about a real unstable?
From: Peter Moulder <reiter@netspace.net.au>
Date: 31 Mar 2000 11:28:24 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] m2og7wlyh3.fsf@river.nuthouse.au>
In-reply-to: John Haggerty's message of "Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:15:29 -0500 (EST)"
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.10.10003290913480.20751-100000@localhost.localdomain>

John Haggerty <haggerjo@localhost.localdomain> writes:

> Plus integrating the e2compr kernel patch into the standard kernels
> provided with debian would also be a plus.

As an alternative, I'll release a kernel-patch-e2compr package in a
couple of days.  Put the following in /etc/apt/sources.list (if you
don't already have one of the other e2compr apt sources there):

  deb http://e2compr.memalpha.cx/e2compr/ftp/apt binary-i386/
  deb-src http://e2compr.memalpha.cx/e2compr/ftp/apt source/

pjm.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: how about a real unstable?
  - From: John Haggerty <haggerjo@localhost.localdomain>

Prev by Date: Re: Packages removed from potato
Next by Date: Re: "GNU/Linux" vs. "Linux"
Previous by thread: Re: how about a real unstable?
Next by thread: Re: how about a real unstable?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread