Re: Signing Packages.gz

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Signing Packages.gz
From: Robert Bihlmeyer <robbe@orcus.priv.at>
Date: 03 Apr 2000 10:24:02 +0200
Message-id: <87g0t3bnj1.fsf@hoss.orcus.priv.at>
In-reply-to: Nicolás Lichtmaier's message of "Sun, 2 Apr 2000 21:04:39 -0300"
References: <20000324124741.F30466@foursquare.net> <874s9u7lnk.fsf@hoss.orcus.priv.at> <20000326090034.E9092@azure.humbug.org.au> <20000326160220.C454@ulysses.dhis.net> <20000327083710.A30185@azure.humbug.org.au> <87wvmoyawk.fsf@hoss.orcus.priv.at> <20000328003108.A7874@azure.humbug.org.au> <878zywo36y.fsf@hoss.orcus.priv.at> <20000402210439.A12547@debian.org>

Nicolás Lichtmaier <nick@debian.org> writes:

>  All packages can run things as root. Even the most simple game.

Doing clandestine things in a install-script is harder than in a
binary.

-- 
Robbe

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Signing Packages.gz
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>

References:
- Re: Signing Packages.gz
  - From: Robert Bihlmeyer <robbe@orcus.priv.at>
- Re: Signing Packages.gz
  - From: Nicolás Lichtmaier <nick@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: DUL (was Re: RBL report..)
Next by Date: Re: Pgcc in Deb
Previous by thread: Re: Signing Packages.gz
Next by thread: Re: Signing Packages.gz
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread