Re: Renaming a package
On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 09:39:26PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 07:48:59PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> > It's sufficient that it be an empty package depending on sawfish, and
> > then when sawfish *is* installed, the C/R/P trick will de-install
> > sawmill.
>
> Are you sure dpkg could handle that, all in one run? That would be cool...
Can the "dummy" (presumeably a new updated sawmill package:
empty) package depend on "sawfish" while "sawfish" conflicts
with "sawmill"?
Reply to: