Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.

To: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
From: Jim Lynch <jim@laney.edu>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 21:27:22 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 200005160427.VAA03394@earth.laney.edu>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 15 May 2000 20:21:52 PDT." <[🔎] 20000515202152.C1899@silk.kitenet.net>

Joey,

I couldn't seem to get info on the testing at the time... but indeed, the
debian-testing list is open and unmoderated. So I stand corrected on that 
point. Was it always open?

-Jim

---
Jim Lynch       Finger for pgp key
as Laney College CIS admin:  jim@laney.edu   http://www.laney.edu/~jim/
as Debian developer:         jwl@debian.org  http://www.debian.org/~jwl/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
  - From: Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net>

References:
- Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: SASL/TLS and mail (MTA and MUA)
Next by Date: Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Previous by thread: Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Next by thread: Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread