Re: Bug#64438: RCS should be in `optional' or `extra', not `standard'
> On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 15:41:24 -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
> > I vote for ``optional''. When someone needs RCS, he know he needs it.
> > `standard' means installing it in a lot of systems, 90% of them won't
> > ever use RCS.
>
> I agree with Nicolás. I'm not sure any configuration management system
> should be `standard'.
Of course RCS is actually a file versioning package, akin to SCCS. Since
many commercial UNIXs ship with SCCS, including RCS seems relatively
logical.
Reply to: