On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 04:39:20AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > > Problem yes, removed no. That's rather draconian. why? all archetectures are in this together no? if some package is broken on sparc thus having the last RC bug. but the every other arch and package is fine do we release potato without sparc? i realize its not an exact comparison given that netscape is one big RC bug in and of itself but debian does not want to remove it given that it would make us a laughing stock, but still 4.7 is an improvment and the powerpc users are PISSED that debian refuses to package it. > We are not other distributions. And why is having a version on powerpc that > is older than i386 a rc bug? because 4.6 is all but unusable it should be removed for that reason, but AFAIK packages cannot be removed from one archecture but not the others. (dark refused to do this after a request from a maintainer iirc) the RC bug is that netscape is mostly worthless as is, not that its outdated per se. > FYI, I saw yet another bug, similiar to the one in 4.72 and earlier, that ALSO > affects 4.73. All I do is shrug. There's not much more one can do. yes i saw that as well, i agree netscape is mostly a lost cause but it would help if we would do the best we can, given there ARE binaries for at least 4.7 (which would buy better stability) why are they not packaged? (from what you said in the last message it seems that question is directed at dark) BTW: a simple `netscape has not released 4.73 binaries and has {ignored,refused} all requests to do so' would have been a sufficient answer, you did not have to flame me over it. i probably should have put an `[if available]' but i didn't think of it. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgpLBymjWybTI.pgp
Description: PGP signature