Re: ITPers should have Sponsors

[Ron Rademaker <ron@wep.tudelft.nl>]

I've been following this thread now, I'm just wondering something:

How is someone supposed to know they need a sponsor to do the ITP when
they are new to the packaging / development / maintainers process????

Ron Rademaker

On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, tony mancill wrote:

> On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Jim Lynch wrote:
> 
> > Howbout this: Developers do ITPs, non-devs do RFS (request for sponsor) and
> > the sponsor does the ITP, announcing the sponsorship at the same time?
> 
> Sounds like a good idea.  At the same time, the sponsor can hook the
> non-devs into the NM chain if they're interested.
> 
> This along with the WNPP proposal that Lars set forth should go a long way
> to preventing rework and general confusion.
> 
>   tony@mancill.com     |  Matter cannot be created or destroyed.
> http://www.debian.org  |  Nor can it be returned without a receipt.
>                        |     (fortune)
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>