Re: Debian 2.2 Release.
Tomasz Wegrzanowski <maniek@beer.com> writes:
> > So your simplistic tests would catch, optimistically, 13 RC bugs, or 37%
> > (not the "99% bugs" you asserted with no evidence), while 20 RC bugs, or
> > 57%, would not be caught.
>
> I was talking about 99% bugs
> {
> caused by upgrade
> if ustream claims package is stable
> and he is right.
> }
That is NOT what you said. And it is NOT what results.
> 3 of above are licensing - we can diff old nad new license before
> installing.
> #65051 (lack of dependency) can be found by improved test.
> (think real: app 1.5 depends on libc, app 1.6 doesn't ???)
> Most of the rest are about problem with upstream version,
> not with Debian.
So what? If the package is in Debian, WE are legitimately concerned
about it.
>
> I stiil claim most of Integration problems are easy to find.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> www.complete.org
Sr. Software Developer, Progeny Linux Systems, Inc. www.progenylinux.com
#include <std_disclaimer.h> <jgoerzen@progenylinux.com>
Reply to: