[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian Weekly News - June 27th, 2000



Hamish Moffatt wrote£º
>On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 01:08:33PM +0300, Lauri Tischler wrote:
>> Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>> > Just what we don't need...
>> That's what narrowminded ideology begets...
>
>I'd agree that setting up a deb repository is narrowminded.
>
>Consider this: any reasonable person who wants to become
>a Debian developer, can become a Debian developer. Once a developer,
>they can contribute to the official .deb repository.

What if someone, (a company, a person don't like the free software, )
wanna work out a .deb, and don't wanna join debian the project
because they have different (wrong, okay? 8) idea with debian SC
and DFSG?

IMHO, deb the packaging format the tech. shall be divided from
the debian the project and debian gnu/{linux,hurd} the distribution.

and people are allowed to put abcdef .deb's everywhere just as
they wish.

The work needs to be done is research on deb format's robustness,
as on an official debian distribution with a user wanna random
souces.list line, he could still survive those bad quality
packages, and be aware of the software and himself/herself's
freedom. just my 2c.

(that's is my long-thought on the previous non-free discuss. 8)
i.e. let the technology says!
(if information wants to be free, they should speak for themselves.
I guess/hope. 8)

--
zw@zhaoway.com
http://www.zhaoway.com/



___________________________________________________________________
·îÏ×°®ÐÄ£¬¹²½¨ÍøÒ×£¨http://www.163.com£©¼ÒÔ°£¬ÇëͶÎÒÃÇһƱ¡£;
http://fsurvey.cnnic.net.cn/survey/index.html



Reply to: