[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sawfish



On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 08:48:59PM -0700, Mike Markley wrote:
> Package: sawmill
> Version: 0.26-2
> Priority: optional
> Section: x11
> Maintainer: Mikolaj J. Habryn <dichro-debian@rcpt.to>
> Depends: imlib1 (>= 1.9.8-4), libaudiofile0, libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libesd0 (>=
> 0.2.16) | libesd-alsa0 (>= 0.2.16), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgmp2,
> libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.7-1), libjpeg62, libncurses5, libpng2, libreadline4 (>=
> 4.1), librep8, libtiff3g, libungif3g (>= 3.0-2) | giflib3g (>= 3.0-5.2),
> libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6), librep8 (>= 0.11), rep (>= 0.11), rep-gtk (>= 0.9)
> Suggests: menu (>= 1.5)
> Provides: x-window-manager
> Architecture: i386
> Filename: dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/x11/sawmill_0.26-2.deb
> Size: 659928
> MD5sum: 1358b1ca1f7a331da0d56a1e01836f89
> Description: a highly configurable window manager for X11
>  Sawmill is an extensible window manager using an Emacs Lisp-like
>  scripting language--all window decorations are configurable, the basic
>  idea is to have as much user-interface policy as possible controlled
>  through the Lisp language. This is no layer on top of twm, but a wholly
>  new architecture.
> installed-size: 2876
> 
> Then the package hasn't been renamed :). I seem to remember a thread about it
> some time ago... a quick search might yield useful infomation.

My whole problem is that version .32 or some such is out. We are still
on .26... Yuk. Also, all this helix gnome stuff is so much newer than
what is even in woody.

-- 
Just once I would like to persuade the audience not to wear any article of
blue denim.  If only they could see themselves in a pair of brown corduroys
like mine instead of this awful, boring blue denim.  I don't enjoy the sky
or sea as much as I used to because of this Levi character.  If Jesus Christ
came back today, He and I would get into our brown corduroys and go to the
nearest jean store and overturn the racks of blue denim.  Then we'd get
crucified in the morning.
		-- Ian Anderson, of Jethro Tull



Reply to: