Re: potato-proposed-updates vs. security

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: potato-proposed-updates vs. security
From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 13:14:13 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000903131413.F6363@justice.loyola.edu>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 14770.34265.504824.752684@cmb1-3.dial-up.arnes.si>; from igor.mozetic@uni-mb.si on Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 07:09:45PM +0200
References: <[🔎] 14770.34265.504824.752684@cmb1-3.dial-up.arnes.si>

On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 07:09:45PM +0200, Igor Mozetic wrote:
> Is there any difference between the packages in
> deb http://ANY.DEBIAN.MIRRIR/debian dists/potato-proposed-updates/
> and
> deb http://security.debian.org/ potato/updates main contrib non-free

Yes.

-- 
Mike Stone

Attachment: pgpeMrvyz_IGe.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- potato-proposed-updates vs. security
  - From: Igor Mozetic <igor.mozetic@uni-mb.si>

Prev by Date: potato-proposed-updates vs. security
Next by Date: Re: why apt/dpkg not using bzip2
Previous by thread: potato-proposed-updates vs. security
Next by thread: libgd1 vs. libgd1g
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread