Re: Access software

[Aaron Howell <aaron@sunrise.cnl.com.au>]

A agree with the statements below.
We should have an access category, things like emacsspeak and emacsspeak-dt belong in there too, since they're generally of no use to anyone without a dectalk
(which is, for the sight enhanced amongst you, a speech synthesizer for the visually impaired.)
I'm sure we will eventually begin to see more access products for linux (and hopefully for debian).
Regards
Aaron
On Mon, Sep 29, 1997 at 03:10:31PM -0400, Christopher C Chimelis wrote:
> Hi...
> 
> I'm in the process of becoming a new maintainer (mostly for the Alpha
> port) and am also packaging some Braille terminal access software
> (brltty).  What I was wondering is what category this kind of software
> falls under?  Granted, it's the only software of it's type right now, but
> would it be feasible to create an "access" category?
-- 
Aaron Howell.	Q.U.T Equity Department, Technical Support/Training.
work: a.howell@qut.edu.au	Linux/Networking Support.
home: a.howell@student.qut.edu.au	phone +61-412-956-467
www: http://www2.cnl.com.au/~aaron	irc: DaRkAnGeL
Support the efforts of the Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial Email. 
http://www.cauce.org for details. help stamp out internet junkmail.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .