Re: qmail-src (was RFC: New source packaging format)
> > If I get rid of /var/qmail, I know I would eventually see a thread on
> > djb-qmail@koobera.math.uic.edu that would go like this:
> > [ranting deleted - iwj]
>
> This is irrelevant. We are system integrators, and should feel free
> to change the layout of a package against the recommendations of the
> package's upstream authors in order to make it fit in with the rest of
> the system.
I'm not sure that the principle of ``Least Surprise'' should be dismissed so
lightly.
The fact that 100% of the current qmail user population expects to be able to
find qmail's configuration files under /var/qmail, suggests to me that there
is little point confusing them for a saving of about 1k of disk space.
There are similar examples of pandering to user expectations that have been
sanctioned by FSSTND:
/usr/bin/X11 -> /usr/X11R6/bin
/usr/lib/sendmail -> /usr/sbin/sendmail
> Furthermore, we have a policy that says we adhere to the FSSTND, which
> does not allow /var/qmail. Ergo, /var/qmail should not exist.
>From the FSSTND:
The point is that symlinks should be there to keep everything where
everyone else expects find it.
> If you don't like this policy you should go to debian-policy to try to
> get it changed (and you will probably not succeed) or just put up with
> it anyway.
I'm fine with this policy, since I happen to think it supports me ;-)
OK, I admit it, it probably doesn't really support me, but I think we have to
show some flexibility in the way we apply such rules, and I see enough leway
in the FSSTND to allow for what I was suggesting.
If I get the impression that the majority of developers think that it is wrong
to create /var/qmail, and that it is important enough to cause the wasted
bandwidth on debian-user and djb-qmail that will inevitably result from
removing it, then I guess I'll have to make it optional in the postinst :-(
The package is currently in a state of flux anyway, since at the moment some
of the configuration files are still really on /var and not /etc (so it's even
worse that you thought :) until I get a chance to write some smart postinst
stuff for moving things around when upgrading.
> Would you like me to file a bug report against qmail ?
If it will make you feel better ;-)
Please note, because of Dan's distribution policy, qmail is non-free by our
definitions, so regardless of the rights or wrongs of /var/qmail, this
`contamination' will not be introduced into the main distribution, only into
non-free.
Cheers, Phil.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . Trouble?
e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: