Re: Dependency and priority mismatches

[bhmit1@mail.wm.edu]

On Mon, 19 Jan 1998, Santiago Vila wrote:

> On Mon, 19 Jan 1998, Richard Braakman wrote:
> 
> >   Section 2.2 Priorities
> >      Packages may not depend on packages with lower priority values. If
> >      this should happen, one of the priority values will have to be
> >      adapted.
> 
> Could not we relax this requirement a little bit for *libraries*?

Could you explain why you want to do this, and what the benifits would be?
I fail to see why you wouldn't want to follow the policy here.

Brandon

-----
Brandon Mitchell <bhmit1@mail.wm.edu>   "We all know linux is great... it
PGP: finger -l bhmit1@cs.wm.edu          does infinite loops in 5 seconds"
Phone: (757) 221-4847                      --Linus Torvalds


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .