Re: restrictions on making books from docs
On Tue, Jan 20, 1998 at 09:48:03PM -0600, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> G John Lapeyre wrote:
> [non-modifiable docs and DFSG]
> I believe some part of TeX comes under a license that is similar to this.
> My understanding is that it's considered DFSG-compliant.
TeX is a special case.
It generally allows changes, but you have to rename the changed file.
Read legal.txt.gz for the full story.
> We also have documentation under doc/ that is under the LDP license, which
> doesn't allow modified redistribution. Maybe we need to clarify DFSG wrt
> documentation (or has this been addressed and I'm just a moron?).
I just looked to the sag copyright statement, and it looks OK for me.
(Is sag's copyright statement identical to the LDP's one?)
David
--
David Frey (51F35923114FC864 7D05FF173C61EFDE)
Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
-- Henry Spencer
--
David Frey (51F35923114FC864 7D05FF173C61EFDE)
Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
-- Henry Spencer
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: