Re: Intent to package proj -- coyright question
fab writes:
> 17 USC 105 is not valid in any EU country, so we end with a package
> _without_ copyright clause, without explicit grant to "public domain"
> (which is required AFAIK).
> Is that software "all rights reserved" outside USA?
That would appear to be the case. idiotic, isn't it? Another reason why
compulsory copyright is a bad idea.
--
John Hasler This posting is in the public domain.
john@dhh.gt.org Do with it what you will.
Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can; I don't mind.
Elmwood, Wisconsin Do not send email advertisements to this address.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: