Re: Post-Hamm/Freeze Proposal
On Mon, Mar 09, 1998 at 12:53:52PM -0800, Jim Pick wrote:
>
> I was thinking about this.
>
> I don't think we should move packages that are rejected from hamm
> into project/orphaned (although we definitely should move them somewhere).
>
> I think that we should open up directories for the next development
> distribution (2.1?) and put them there. What are we going to call
> that? A nickname from "Bug's Life", maybe?
Oh, you are *funny*! :-) I like your idea! :-)
> This should happen when the freeze occurs.
>
> We should encourage developers to stick with hamm, however. This
> means leaving the 'unstable' link pointing to 'hamm' (the 'frozen'
> link will point there too).
>
> We could have a 'pre-unstable' link pointing to the next development
> distribution for uploads that aren't bugfixes.
>
> What's everybody think?
>
> Cheers,
I like your approach; it is more balanced. :-) Way to go, Jim!
Anthony
--
Anthony Fok Tung-Ling foka@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca
Civil Engineering http://www.ualberta.ca/~foka/
University of Alberta, Canada Keep smiling! *^_^*
--
E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to listmaster@debian.org .
Reply to: