Re: icmp-logger virtual package

To: hh223@hermes.cam.ac.uk (Hugo Haas)
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org (Debian Development)
Subject: Re: icmp-logger virtual package
From: Michael Meskes <meskes@topsystem.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 10:16:02 +0100 (CET)
Message-id: <[🔎] 199803190916.KAA02186@gauss.topsystem.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.SOL.3.95q.980319004242.22537A-100000@red.csi.cam.ac.uk> from Hugo Haas at "Mar 19, 98 00:51:21 am"

Hugo Haas writes:
> There's no point in installing jail _and_ iplogger, because they're doing
> the same job (well, iplogger also has an additionnal TCP event logger, but
> as far as ICMP packets are concerned, icmplog and icmplogd more or less
> identical).

If they are more or less the same, why do we need both packages?

Michael

-- 
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager    | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
meskes@topsystem.de                    | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
meskes@debian.org                      | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire!             | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
Use Debian GNU/Linux!                  | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: icmp-logger virtual package
  - From: Anselm Lingnau <lingnau@tm.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de>

References:
- Re: icmp-logger virtual package
  - From: Hugo Haas <hh223@hermes.cam.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Uploads to frozen
Next by Date: Re: Initial draft proposed consitutution (v0.1)
Previous by thread: Re: icmp-logger virtual package
Next by thread: Re: icmp-logger virtual package
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread