Re: dictd and wordnet
Hi,
> > The old WordNet packages used usr/lib/wordnet/dict/. I believe
> This seemed me a bad choice and so I wanted to change it.
I agree. It seems undesirable to create a directory with nothing
in it but a subdirectory, if there is no expectation of adding more
files or directories to it.
> > either /usr/lib/dict/ or /usr/lib/dict/wordnet/ (since wordnet installs
> The last choice /usr/lib/dict/wordnet is possibly the best one in my
> opinion.
Agreed.
> Hmm, so we should think about using /usr/share from the beginning because
> hamm is frozen and will not contain wordnet ( :-( ) and 2.1 will
> move to FHS.
>
> That would mean that the wordnet dictionaries should go into
> /usr/share/dict/wordnet
> right?
I think so. However I haven't heard any policy statements about
how to implement the FHS, so I don't know if its appropriate to start
doing this now. Maybe someone more knowledgeable will comment on this.
Bob
--
_
|_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard <hilliard@flinet.com>
|_) (_) |_) Palm City, FL USA PGP Key ID: A8E40EB9
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: