Re: Making the libc5-libc6 upgrade to be safe (was: netstd...)

To: sanvila@unex.es
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Making the libc5-libc6 upgrade to be safe (was: netstd...)
From: Chris Fearnley <cjf@netaxs.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 1998 12:29:34 -0400 (EDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] 199804191629.MAA22759@unix3.netaxs.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980416220218.11887A-100000@cantor.unex.es> from "Santiago Vila" at Apr 16, 98 10:45:01 pm

'Santiago Vila wrote:'
>
>Please, tell me how much harm does to add a Pre-Depends field on libc6,
>ncurses3.4 and libreadlineg2 for netstd. I can tell you how much
>inconvenience does *not* to add it and then we can make a comparison
>between those two inconveniences.

Too much, IMHO.

-- 
Christopher J. Fearnley          |  Linux/Internet Consulting
cjf@netaxs.com                   |  Design Science Revolutionary
http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf       |  Explorer in Universe
ftp://ftp.netaxs.com/people/cjf  |  "Dare to be Naïve" -- Bucky Fuller


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Making the libc5-libc6 upgrade to be safe (was: netstd...)
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>

Prev by Date: Re: A little ircii /dcc tweak I'd like to see the default...
Next by Date: Re: Problems with pgp signed mails
Previous by thread: Re: Making the libc5-libc6 upgrade to be safe (was: netstd...)
Next by thread: Where are the boot floppies?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread