Re: Intent to package pine-src

To: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Intent to package pine-src
From: James Troup <J.J.Troup@scm.brad.ac.uk>
Date: 01 May 1998 12:34:08 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] dmmd8dyfcnj.fsf@dcsun4.comp.brad.ac.uk>
In-reply-to: Santiago Vila's message of "Fri, 1 May 1998 12:41:28 +0200 (CEST)"
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980501123656.5760C-100000@cantor.unex.es>

Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:

> > Please think very hard about the benefits of our current system
> > before advocating a replacement for it.
> 
> The pine-src package will not replace the already existing pine
> source in the "source" directory.

I was not talking about pine-src, as I made clear in the parts of my
message you cut out.

-- 
James


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Intent to package pine-src
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>

Prev by Date: Re: source packages and censorship
Next by Date: Re: Conflicts between developers and policy
Previous by thread: Re: source packages and censorship
Next by thread: Re: Intent to package pine-src
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread