Re: Packages marked as Obsolete
On Mon, May 04, 1998 at 09:44:41AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
> While we are talking about obsolete packages, what is the
> story on these? I mean, I would not like to just remove all the
> picons packages (why are they marked obsolete)? What about ckermit?
> How many of these are actually obsolete, and how many just have been
> yanked from hamm?
>
> *** sound Opt gom-x 0.29.10-1.1 <none>
The maintainer has posted something abuot this a few days ago.
> *** utils Opt wordnet 1.5-3 <none>
> *** utils Opt wordnetbase 1.5-1 <none>
Andreas Tille maintains wordnet. His maintainer registration
unfortunately got stalled due to severe problems on pgp.net.
> *** utils Opt wordnetdoc 1.5-3 <none>
> *** x11 Opt tkdesk 1.0b4-2.1 <none>
We have a new maintainer for it, I just always forget who
it is. There's also a new version of tkdesk. Found him, he's
Daniel Martin <fizbin@debian.org>
Regards,
Joey
--
/ Martin Schulze * joey@infodrom.north.de * 26129 Oldenburg /
/ http://home.pages.de/~joey/
/ Unable to locate coffee, operator halted. -- Stefan Farsch /
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: