Re: hamm

["James R. Van Zandt" <jrv@vanzandt.mv.com>]

Bob Hilliard <hilliard@flinet.com> writes:
>Kenneth.Scharf@coulter.com writes:
>> Trying to upgrade via FTP to hamm would be too painfull at 28.8KB!
>
>Hi, 
>     It depends on your pain threshold, I guess.  I thought that too,
>until I started the bo testihng program a little over a year ago.
>Since then I have updated from rex to bo, then bo to hamm, and am
>maintaining a hamm and slink mirror (i386 binary only), all over a
>28.8 link.

I maintain a hamm mirror at work.  According to my records, the
traffic to keep hamm up to date amounts to about 20 MB/day.

                                     - Jim Van Zandt


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org