Re: Re^2: Should we ship KDE in hamm?

To: "Fulgham, Brent/SCO" <BFulgham@CH2M.com>, 'Oliver Elphick' <olly@lfix.co.uk>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Re^2: Should we ship KDE in hamm?
From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 17:10:42 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980723171042.38146@test.legislate.com>
Mail-followup-to: "Fulgham, Brent/SCO" <BFulgham@CH2M.com>, 'Oliver Elphick' <olly@lfix.co.uk>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 524299DFAB41D11193EF00805F8598027FEBE1@brekka.ch2m.com>; from Fulgham, Brent/SCO on Thu, Jul 23, 1998 at 03:03:17PM -0600
References: <[🔎] 524299DFAB41D11193EF00805F8598027FEBE1@brekka.ch2m.com>

Fulgham, Brent/SCO <BFulgham@CH2M.com> wrote:
> I agree with Oliver's assessment.  I don't think that it is correct to
> say that Debian is violating the KDE license by distributing KDE without
> the Qt library.

I don't think that's the issue.

-- 
Raul


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- RE: Re^2: Should we ship KDE in hamm?
  - From: "Fulgham, Brent/SCO" <BFulgham@CH2M.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Where is slang's source?
Next by Date: Re: Status of KDE/Qt - interim decision
Previous by thread: RE: Re^2: Should we ship KDE in hamm?
Next by thread: Re: Re^2: Should we ship KDE in hamm?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread