Re: Offensive purity tests missing
Ian Jackson <ian@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
> However, my understanding of the rough consensus the last time this
> came up was that we _would_ distribute the potentially offensive
> tests. Perhaps I should go and check the list archives.
That is my recollection as well.
> I'm therefore considering releasing a `purity-off' package, like
> `fortunes-off', which contains the missing tests. What would people's
> reaction be ?
I'd be in favor.
--
Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: