[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh



bmbuck@acsu.buffalo.edu (Buddha Buck)  wrote on 02.08.98 in <"otsK3B.A.zLF.QTjx1"@murphy>:

> One problem I see is a poor definition of essential packages.  The
> distinction between required and essential packages isn't clear from
> the policy manual. "Required" packages are defined as "necessary for
> the proper functioning of the system."  Removing a required package may
> break the system.   "Essential" packages are defined as "packages that
> are *essential* for a system".  By these definitions, how do required
> and essential packages differ?

My take is that required packages are required for the system as a whole,  
essential packages are required for the installation subsystem (dpkg and  
friends).

That is, if you remove required packages, your system is broken until you  
reinstall them. But if you remove essential packages, your system will  
need manual surgery - dpkg will be broken, and "just reinstall them" won't  
work.

MfG Kai


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: