Re: Draft new DFSG
Sven LUTHER <luther@maxime.u-strasbg.fr> wrote:
> > i understand that you dislike the patch clause, but will this not,
> > now that Qt has adopted a "free" license upto the patch, again
> > become non-free ? And would we not be critiqued for it ?
Qt hasn't adopted a "free" license, yet. [Though they appear to be
serious about probably adopting one.]
Navindra Umanee <navindra@cs.mcgill.ca> wrote:
> Oh, you are right. This is great. Just great. I'm also wondering
> why certain Debian members tend to vote against KDE newsgroups.
[I didn't vote on any KDE newsgroups but] It's probably worth pointing out
that version 0.90 of the QPL does not apply to any Troll Tech software.
Because of the contradictory nature of this license, I don't expect
anyone to ever use it as a license for any software or for anthing else.
The QPL is barely even vaporware: it's just a draft document.
--
Raul
Reply to: