Re: what about Pine's license?
>From the pine license:
> (c) Inclusion in a CD-ROM collection of free-of-charge, shareware, or
> non-proprietary software for which a fee may be charged for the
> packaged distribution.
Bruce writes:
> ... but it is ok to charge for a distribution if you are producing CD's.
Unless those CD's contain something which is neither free-of-charge,
shareware, nor non-proprietary software.
> Why does non-free == no modified binaries?
It doesn't. There are many other reasons why a pacakge may be non-free.
--
John Hasler This posting is in the public domain.
john@dhh.gt.org Do with it what you will.
Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can; I don't mind.
Elmwood, Wisconsin Do not send email advertisements to this address.
Reply to: