Re: Unmet Deps revisted
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >If there are optional packages that conflict with each other, we should
> >choose one to stay in optional and move the others to extra. (Or change/
> >clarify the definition on the policy manual).
>
> The manual should be fixed IMHO - there are lots of places where this is
> bogus. Consider the xserver packages, for example...
This is not a good example.
The xserver packages do not conflict at each other.
You can install all of them.
--
"ab1fe6591d2b31988b4d95c5752b8fe7" (a truly random sig)
Reply to: