Re: what needs to be policy?

To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: what needs to be policy?
From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 14:05:09 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 19990123140509.D349@kitenet.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-policy@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19990123114440.D30279@hazel>; from Raul Miller on Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 11:44:40AM -0500
References: <[🔎] 19990109224255.J32046@kitenet.net> <[🔎] 19990123114440.D30279@hazel>

Raul Miller wrote:
> Policy should be rather broad in scope and concise in expression.

Amen.

-- 
see shy jo

Reply to:

References:
- what needs to be policy?
  - From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
- Re: what needs to be policy?
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>

Prev by Date: Re: the Great X Reorganization, package splits, and renaming
Next by Date: Re: the Great X Reorganization, package splits, and renaming
Previous by thread: Re: what needs to be policy?
Next by thread: Appreciating developers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread