Re: DFSG v2 Draft #5

[Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>]

On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 01:24:13AM -0800, Darren Benham wrote:
> 
> On 25-Jan-99 Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > IMHO we should also be discussing how the vote on this proposal will
> > be structured.  My understanding is that there are multiple DFSG
> > revision proposals "out there", even though this one is the only one
> > being currently hashed out on the list.
> > 
> > My voting structure proposal is (using preference voting):
> > 
> > [ ] Retain current DFSG
> > [ ] Revised DFSG proposal by A and B
> > [ ] Revised DFSG proposal by C
> > ...
> > [ ] None of the above alternatives is acceptable
> > 
> 
> I envision it as being:
> 
>  [ ] ORIGINAL Draft
>  [ ] Draft w/o patch clause
>  [ ] Draft w/o advertising clause
>  [ ] Draft w/o both clauses
>  [ ] Current DFSG
>  [ ] FURTHER Discussion (required by constitution)

Please include URLs, there are SO MANY different proposals we really
should give people pointers to exactly which they're voting on.


-- 
"I'm working in the dark here."  "Yeah well rumor has it you do your best
work in the dark."
                               -- Earth: Final Conflict