Re: kernel-image-2.0.{33,34,35,36} in slink
On Feb 15, Guy Maor wrote:
> Would it be reasonable to remove all but 36, or are the older ones
> better for some people?
m68k needs 2.0.33 (at least until a 2.0.36 m68k-patch package is
available). Otherwise as far as I'm concerned 34 and 35 can go.
Chris
--
=============================================================================
| Chris Lawrence | My home page: |
| <quango@watervalley.net> | http://www.clark.net/pub/lawrencc/ |
| | |
| Grad Student, Pol. Sci. | Your site belongs here. |
| University of Mississippi | [Commercialize your sig today!] |
=============================================================================
Reply to: