Re: Release-critical Bugreport for February 16, 1999
On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 02:43:51PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> The conflict is a bug, IMHO.
No, it's not.
> asclock refuses an afterstep which is <= 1.4.5.3-1 while the one in slink
> is precisely 1.4.5.3-1.
which precisely the one in hamm. It's not like there wasn't enough time. I
put the 'Conflicts' there for a reason.
> Since asclock is not in the master list, it's not a real problem for the
> boot-floppies package.
Uh? What's the master list?
I got a bug because asclock conflicts with afterstep and both packages are
installed by the "Workstation Std" configuration. The configuration comes
from the boot floppies (or the base tarball, I dunno, it's the same thing,
isn't it?), so I guess the place to fix this is the boot floppies package.
Marcelo
Reply to: