Re: current document policy ?
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: current document policy ?
- From: Adam Di Carlo <aph@debian.org>
- Date: 01 Apr 1999 01:09:13 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] oabth8hnxy.fsf@burrito.fake>
- In-reply-to: John Lapeyre's message of "Tue, 30 Mar 1999 19:31:01 -0700"
- References: <19990330192708.B12537@homey.physics.arizona.edu> <19990330193101.C12537@homey.physics.arizona.edu>
>>>>> "lapeyre" == John Lapeyre <lapeyre@physics.arizona.edu> writes:
lapeyre> wanted to say: Is there any documentation on what the
lapeyre> currently preferred method is for registering documentations
lapeyre> with some system (like dwww). Something in developer's
lapeyre> corner like the "menu system" document would be nice.
lapeyre> I couldn't find anything indicating that document
lapeyre> registration system exists. Thanks for any clues... John
Install doc-base, it has documentation. It has no official blessing
(like debhelper), but it's widely regarded as the most convenient
system. It's hardcoded to drive dwww and dhelp now; I'm hoping to
replace all that with a hook system so it can drive 'n' different
backend display systems.
--
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: