[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: intent of package seti@home



On Fri, 23 Apr, 1999, John Hasler wrote:
> > Perhaps occasional false data with a fake signal would help.
> 
> Test packets (good idea) are an additional way of validating clients, but
> not a substitute for duplication.
> 
> It occurs to me that your test packets could require the client to compute
> an md5sum on itself and send it in along with its version data.  This would
> pretty much require that everyone runs a binary issued or registered by
> SETI, though.

And J. Random Cracker can have a copy of the real binary, when a md5sum is
requested, it just sends that the md5sum of that binary rather than itself.

-- 
I consume, therefore I am

Attachment: pgpuHPvZUA5RO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: