Re: Bug#39823: tetex-bin: Texinfo tools should have their own package =(
Christoph Martin <martin@uni-mainz.de> writes:
> Josip Rodin writes:
> > On Sun, Jun 20, 1999 at 05:48:31PM -0300, Nicol,Aa(Bs Lichtmaier wrote:
> > > Look:
> > > "Need to get 13.9Mb of archives. After unpacking 34.8Mb will be used."
> > >
> > > I don't use TeX. I won't use TeX. I just need to use the texinfo
> > > tools... =(
> >
> > [ BTW I thought I submitted a bug like this before... odd. ]
> >
> > Anyway, I also think texinfo stuff should be removed from tetex-bin
> > package.
> >
> > I'm texinfo source package maintainer, but I don't know which sources
> > are better - GNU texinfo ones or those from teTeX? If the former, I'll
> > include a 'texinfo' binary package from texinfo source. If it is the
> > latter case, then tetex maintainer has to split it out himself.
>
> So, someone should find out, which one is better.
AFAIK, there's nothing different now (between tetex 0.9.99* and
texinfo 3.12. 3.12i has more features like HTML output by makeinfo).
But I prefer texinfo source. tetex's texinfo stuffs easily get out of
date.
--
Changwoo Ryu
Reply to: