[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libtool problem with ImageMagick



Actually, it is more of a problem of the imagemagick sources trying to be
too cute for their own good and compile the perlmagick extension at the
same time.  I'm not certain there is a useful fix for this, other than to
not build the perl extension here, but to get the broken-out perlmagick
source and build it seperately (it used to be done that way anyhow).

On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Andreas Tille wrote:

> after detecting, that the ImageMagick package of slink is fairly
> unusable and sending a bug report, I decided to do further
> investigation because the author dosn't have time and I need it
> really soon.
> 
> I tried to compile the slink source (4.2.2) and the latest upstream
> source (4.2.7) with the same result:
> 
> LD_RUN_PATH="/usr/X11R6/lib:/usr/lib:/lib" cc -o blib/arch/auto/Image/Magick/Magick.so  -shared -L/usr/local/lib Magick.o   -lc -L/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lMagick -ltiff -ljpeg -lpng -lXext -lX11 -lbz2 -lz -lm
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot open -lMagick: No such file or directory
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [blib/arch/auto/Image/Magick/Magick.so] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/e2od5/local/debian-maintain/other/imagemagick/ImageMagick-4.2.7/PerlMagick'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> 
> I suspect a libtool problem because:
> 
> > find . -name libMagick\*
> ./ImageMagick-4.2.7/magick/.libs/libMagick.so.4.0.27
> ./ImageMagick-4.2.7/magick/.libs/libMagick.so.4
> ./ImageMagick-4.2.7/magick/.libs/libMagick.so
> ./ImageMagick-4.2.7/magick/.libs/libMagick.lai
> ./ImageMagick-4.2.7/magick/.libs/libMagick.la
> ./ImageMagick-4.2.7/magick/libMagick.la
> 
> Is there anybody who can tell me what I have to do to enable ld
> to find the library??
> 
> Kind regards
> 
>          Andreas.
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 

-- 
Scott K. Ellis <storm@gate.net>                 http://www.gate.net/~storm/


Reply to: