Re: apt bug?
On Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 11:45:39AM -0700, John Lapeyre wrote:
> *Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> > This just gotta' be a apt bug...
> >
> I had a similar problem a couple of times (not related to
> perl). Package a depends on package b. I check b; dpkg -l
> shows that the correct version of b is installed and configured,
> but apt will not install a, saying that b needs to be installed.
> Apt will not install b, because its already the most recent version.
Is there an apt-get parm that'll make it a bit more verbose on this issue? I
don't have any funny situations around to test it on. Maybe it would be good
to print a bit more info if apt-get has to get smarter than X steps to resolve
an issue ?
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sarel Botha | Computer & | +27 341 81341
(sjb@dundee.lia.net) | Accounting | BOX 2065, Dundee
| Services | 3000, South Africa
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to:
- References:
- apt bug?
- From: Turbo Fredriksson <turbo@debian.org>
- Re: apt bug?
- From: John Lapeyre <lapeyre@physics.arizona.edu>