Re: [release-critical] NFS locking, policy, fcntl(), and liblockfile.
- To: Thomas Roessler <roessler@guug.de>
- Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, wakkerma@debian.org, miquels@cistron.nl, "Marco d'Itri" <md@linux.it>
- Subject: Re: [release-critical] NFS locking, policy, fcntl(), and liblockfile.
- From: Roland Rosenfeld <roland@spinnaker.de>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 13:21:44 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19990827132144.I419@spinnaker.rhein.de>
- Mail-followup-to: Thomas Roessler <roessler@guug.de>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, wakkerma@debian.org, miquels@cistron.nl, Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19990827113115.B20385@sobolev.rhein.de>
- References: <19990827001507.A20758@master.debian.org> <[🔎] 19990827113115.B20385@sobolev.rhein.de>
Thomas Roessler schrieb am Freitag, den 27. August 1999:
> While cache invalidation actually depends on the presence of NFS
> locking support on the server in Linux 2.2 up to and including
> 2.2.11, there is a patch from Olaf Titz for this, so we can consider
> this part of the problem fixed.
The author of that patch is Olaf Kirch <okir@monad.swb.de>, not Olaf
Titz.
> (When only potato systems are involved, fixing #43448 should also
> make that part of the problem go away.)
Just for information: #43448 was fixed yesterday with nfs-common
1.4.7-2 (thanks for the quick upload of the fixed package!).
Tschoeeee
Roland
--
* roland@spinnaker.de * http://www.spinnaker.de/ *
PGP: 1024/DD08DD6D 2D E7 CC DE D5 8D 78 BE 3C A0 A4 F1 4B 09 CE AF
Reply to: