On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 11:32:08PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: > I think we have an obligation to provide readline4 as an option at least > if for no other reason than to make it available to people writing C++ > code[2] who otherwise must resort to evil things... This is a bug against libreadlineg2-dev then --- it's header files should work from both C and C++ without complaint. > Okay, where's the first accusation of package hijacking? => I'll take > you all on! Yeah, I ain't scared of ya's! Are ya's yellah or sumthin?[4] None of the package names seem like they'd conflict, so I don't see the problem personally. I'd say go for it. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. PGP encrypted mail preferred. ``The thing is: trying to be too generic is EVIL. It's stupid, it results in slower code, and it results in more bugs.'' -- Linus Torvalds
Attachment:
pgpSLAqV_Wtb_.pgp
Description: PGP signature