[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#47450: marked as done (project: dpkg-dev_1.4.1.13_all.deb trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/dpkg-scansources')



Your message dated Fri, 15 Oct 1999 00:20:02 +0200
with message-id <19991015002002.A24502@k6.resI.insa-lyon.fr>
and subject line Bug#47450: project: dpkg-dev_1.4.1.13_all.deb  trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/dpkg-scansources'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 1999 21:33:52 +0000
Received: (qmail 15815 invoked from network); 14 Oct 1999 21:33:51 -0000
Received: from qicstart.phx.mcd.mot.com (HELO borg.phx.mcd.mot.com) (144.191.26.9)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 1999 21:33:51 -0000
Received: from thix.phx.mcd.mot.com (thiX.phx.mcd.mot.com [144.191.11.176])
	by borg.phx.mcd.mot.com (8.8.5/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA48202;
	Thu, 14 Oct 1999 14:33:50 -0700
Received: from jstevens by thix.phx.mcd.mot.com with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
	id 11bsVR-0001iq-00; Thu, 14 Oct 1999 14:33:49 -0700
From: <jstevens@borg.phx.mcd.mot.com>
Subject: project: dpkg-dev_1.4.1.13_all.deb  trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/dpkg-scansources'
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.2
Message-Id: <[🔎] E11bsVR-0001iq-00@thix.phx.mcd.mot.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 14:33:49 -0700

Package: project
Version: 19991014
Severity: important

Preparing to replace dpkg-dev 1.4.1.6 (using .../dpkg-dev_1.4.1.13_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement dpkg-dev ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/dpkg-dev_1.4.1.13_all.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/dpkg-scansources', which is also in package dpkg


-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux thix 2.2.12 #4 SMP Wed Oct 13 13:30:21 MST 1999 i586 unknown

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 47450-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 1999 22:20:08 +0000
Received: (qmail 26699 invoked from network); 14 Oct 1999 22:20:07 -0000
Received: from i511.resi.insa-lyon.fr (HELO k6.resI.insa-lyon.fr) (134.214.164.9)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 1999 22:20:07 -0000
Received: by k6.resI.insa-lyon.fr (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 72B2A40B4; Fri, 15 Oct 1999 00:20:02 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <19991015002002.A24502@k6.resI.insa-lyon.fr>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 00:20:02 +0200
From: Raphael Hertzog <rhertzog@hrnet.fr>
To: jstevens@borg.phx.mcd.mot.com, 47450-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#47450: project: dpkg-dev_1.4.1.13_all.deb  trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/dpkg-scansources'
References: <[🔎] E11bsVR-0001iq-00@thix.phx.mcd.mot.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93i
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E11bsVR-0001iq-00@thix.phx.mcd.mot.com>; from jstevens@borg.phx.mcd.mot.com on Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 02:33:49PM -0700

Le Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 02:33:49PM -0700, jstevens@borg.phx.mcd.mot.com écrivait:
> Preparing to replace dpkg-dev 1.4.1.6 (using .../dpkg-dev_1.4.1.13_all.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement dpkg-dev ...
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/dpkg-dev_1.4.1.13_all.deb (--unpack):
>  trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/dpkg-scansources', which is also in package dpkg

Please install this package with --force-overwrite. dpkg 1.4.1.6 was
wrong and the latest package is correct. The dpkg-scansources script
is well placed in dpkg-dev.

We won't add a replace field for an old bad package never released in
stable ...

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog >> 0C4CABF1 >> http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~raphael/
<pub> CD Debian : http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~raphael/debian/#cd </pub>


Reply to: