Re: should xerces24 be removed?
> > There are currently four versions of the xerces packages in sid:
> > xerce21, xerces23, xerces24, and xerces25. These contain upstream
> > versions 2.1.0, 2.3.0, 2.4.0, and 2.5.0 respectively. Given that
> > nothing depends upon xerces24 and that xerces25 was introduced at the
> > same time into debian, can anyone think of any reason why I should not
> > request removal of xerces24?
> >
>
> Hopefully sometime soon I'll be able to finish packaging Berkely DB XML.
> It seems to require xerces24. So can you keep it for now?
Okay, I'll leave it alone. Since a version of xerces24 is already in
sarge, I'll leave it in both sid and sarge (i.e., I'll take no
action). Thanks for the response. Now I can finally stop
flip-flopping on this issue. :-)
--
Jay Berkenbilt <ejb@ql.org>
http://www.ql.org/q/
Reply to: