I will add a Lintian warning if debian/uscan is a file.
Le 25 févr. 2014 20:44, "Simon Kainz" <simon@familiekainz.at> a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> I use a daily dump of
>
> svn://svn.debian.org/svn/collab-qa/packages-metadata
>
> to get the URLS from upstream metadata into DUCK. Does this naming conflict somehow change
> the structure of this repo? Currently i process *.upstream files and i wonder if they also might get renamed somehow.
>
> Regards,
>
> Simon
>
>
> Am 2014-02-07 06:54, schrieb Charles Plessy:
>
>> Le Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 12:41:51AM -0500, James McCoy a écrit :
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 01:18:09PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>>>
>>> > There are other issues with uscan/DEP-12;
>>> >
>>> > debian/watch is duplicated in the Watch field in DEP-12 debian/upstream.
>>>
>>> Partially. DEP-12 assumes it to be a version=3 format line and only
>>> supports a single line.
>>
>>
>> Hello everbody,
>>
>> I regret all the confusion that I created, in this thread and in the Debian Med
>> team, by storing a copy of the watch file in the debian/upstream files in the
>> packages that I maintain.
>>
>> I did that for fun and did not intend to suggest that there was any
>> support on any
>> plan in the short/mid term to superseed the debian/watch file.
>>
>> Please just ignore this field. I do not intend at all to make it part of DEP
>> 12 (which will be updated after I repair the DEP website, that is still broken
>> after the last reform of Alioth).
>>
>> Have a nice day,
>>
>> --
>> Charles Plessy
>> Debian Med packaging team,
>> http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
>> Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 93f1ce9b873f582b7d3fe40a0014017a@familiekainz.at">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 93f1ce9b873f582b7d3fe40a0014017a@familiekainz.at
>