Hi, On 05-10-15 11:30, Graham Inggs wrote: > Hi All > > Nico and Felix are seeking guidance on whether to split the Trilinos > binary packages so that each installs a single shared library or > whether to lump them all together, as was done in the previous > packaging (trilinos 10.4.0.dfsg-1, RM'd 2012-05-15). Policy advises > "When in doubt, always split shared library packages so that each > binary package installs a single shared library" [1]. Their current > packaging [2] is split into 90+ pacakges. If you are worried about the sheer number of packages, I think grouping all the -dev packages into one may make sense here (@Graham: as we did with motif). Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature