On Thu, 25 May 2017 11:59:25 -0700 Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org> wrote: > On May 25 2017, Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> wrote: > > Then in dgit-user(7), the SUMMARY would become > > > > SUMMARY > > (These runes will be discussed later.) > > > > % dgit clone glibc jessie,-security > > % cd glibc > > % wget 'https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=28250;mbox=yes;msg=89' | patch -p1 -u > > % git commit -a -m 'Fix libc lost output bug' > > % sudo apt-get build-dep glibc > > I think the last line should better be > > $ mk-build-deps -i > > ..in that case you won't get bitten if the build deps of the new package > differ from the build deps of the package in the archive. > > Does build-dep require deb-src in sources.list? If so, the above removes > that requirement as well. Yes, deb-src line is needed in sources.list. And build-dep command requires the package already in the archive. So maybe it's better to use command below to fit all cases: mk-build-deps --root-cmd sudo --install --tool "apt-get -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=yes --no-install-recommends" (from wiki [0]) [0] https://wiki.debian.org/Mentors/Review Cheers, -- Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
Attachment:
pgpbUm53e6eKe.pgp
Description: PGP signature