On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 09:02:04PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 05/24/2018 08:53 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 May 2018, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> >> None of the other QA tools mail the maintainer without them asking for
> >> it, autopkgtest shouldn't either.
> >
> > With the exception of piuparts, none of them affect testing migration.
>
> What makes autopkgtest such a beautiful and unique snowflake that it
> should be treated differently from piuparts?
If you have added an autopkgtest to your package, you probably have an
interest on it being run and pass, otherwise why did you bother in the
first place?
Or if those tests come from autdep8, then simply ask for the package to
be removed from the whitelist, or don't make your package be a snowflake
that autodep8 doesn't work for it.
> > Conversely, the autoremoval mails and the testing migration mails are sent
> > to package maintainers by default.
>
> Those are not from QA tools, and don't contain false positives.
autoremoval mails contains tons of false positive and cases where
regular package maintainers can do nothing about but watch.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature