On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 10:36:58AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 01-06-18 16:32, Chris Lamb wrote: > > … wouldn't we just binNMU these? > There are many packages in your list that are arch:all only, and those can't be > binNMU'ed. Still I'm not sure we can do some several thousand binNMUs. But that > number could get reduced due to maintainer uploads and binNMUs due to unrelated > transitions. also, binNMUs break multi-arch, see #894441, so I'm not a fan (of the current implementation of) binNMUs. -- cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature