Hello, On Sat 26 Oct 2019 at 04:24PM -07, Russ Allbery wrote: >> It probably would also be useful if the metadata had some standardized >> way to indicate the preferred way to propose changes to either upstream >> or the debian packaging maintainer --- whether it's e-mail to a >> particular e-mail address, or a pull request, etc. > > Hm, that's an interesting thought. I do generally include that sort of > information in the docuemntation of all packages for which I'm upstream, > but for Debian I've assumed the preferred way to propose changes is the > BTS. Now that's potentially changing with Salsa. I don't really mind > monitoring multiple input formats, but some people will. I think that README.source is a fine place for this sort of information. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature